In Dr. Anila Daulatzai v. State of Maryland and Southwest Airways Co., Nos. 21-2214 (L), 22-1816 (4th Cir.), plaintiff-appellant was forcibly faraway from a flight by Maryland Transportation Authority Law enforcement officials after Southwest staff denied her passage. Plaintiff-appellant claimed that her removing was primarily based on her race and, after amendments to her grievance, claimed racial discrimination, intentional torts, and federal and state constitutional violations. Southwest claimed that plaintiff-appellant was eliminated as a result of she had instructed a number of Southwest staff that she was deathly allergic to canine, of which there have been two on the flight.
The trial court docket granted an unopposed movement to dismiss the second amended grievance, which plaintiff-appellant appealed, after which—in a 41-page choice following a restricted remand by the Fourth Circuit—denied a movement to file a 3rd amended grievance. Daulatzai v. Maryland, No. JKB-21-0590, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105081 (D. Md. June 8, 2022). The 2 appeals have been consolidated by the Fourth Circuit, and plaintiff-appellant’s opening temporary is due September twelfth.
Daulatzai v. SWA, Nos. 21-2214 (L), 22-1816 (4th Cir.).
[View source.]
